Can the Cancer Moonshot Work? Complicated Factors Are in Orbit

With a new president, what happens to the Cancer Moonshot? And how likely is it to succeed, anyway?

5:25 PM

Author | Nicole Fawcett

Is the Cancer Moonshot program hitting the mark?

When President John F. Kennedy called for an initiative in 1961 to get the United States to the moon by the end of the decade, it galvanized an industry and inspired a nation.

Can the same happen with cancer?

MORE FROM THE LAB: Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

In January 2016, President Barack Obama announced a "Cancer Moonshot" to achieve a decade's worth of progress in cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment in five years.

The initiative, led by Vice President Joe Biden, was given $1.8 billion over the next seven years as part of the 21st Century Cures Act that passed Congress with bipartisan support in early December. This secures the project's future under a new administration.

It's a shot in the arm, cancer researchers say, but may not be enough.

After all, cancer is much more complex than traveling to outer space.

"Cancer is too complicated to be solved by a moonshot. This analogy implies that everything is available, the technology is all there, and all we need to do is assemble it. That's not going to be the case," says Ted Lawrence, M.D., Ph.D., Isadore Lampe Professor and chair of radiation oncology at the University of Michigan.

"Although the extra support is certainly very welcome, we're not going to cure cancer with $1.8 billion over seven years. So what's going to happen when people ask for results?"

Building bridges

Regardless of the funding, a greater value of the Moonshot might lie in the collaborations it's fueling, says Daniel F. Hayes, M.D., Stuart B. Padnos professor of Breast Cancer Research at U-M's Rogel Cancer Center.

SEE ALSO: International Collaboration Leads to Clues About Rare Cancer

"Is $1.8 billion enough? I don't think this is going to collapse 10 years of research," Hayes says. "But what's already happening is people are talking together who didn't used to. I'm not sure the money is going to be as important as the galvanizing impact."

For example, 20 institutions representing government, academia and industry have come together as part of the Moonshot's Blood Profiling Atlas. The initiative will aggregate raw data sets from circulating tumor cells, circulating DNA and other assays and make these large pools of data freely available to qualified researchers.

The project will also involve sharing sample preparation and handling protocols from multiple groups to create best practices and standards.

Significant progress

Hayes and Lawrence agree that great strides have been made in recent years to improve cancer care.

"This is an amazing time for cancer research," Lawrence says. "We have so many discoveries that are translatable. The science has exploded and we need to take advantage of it to take it to the next level of treatment."

Recent discoveries have given researchers an understanding of how cancer cells differ from normal cells, and how to harness the immune system to attack cancer. Thanks to new treatments stemming from this knowledge, some patients with melanoma or lung cancer are now cured of their disease.

But there is plenty more work to do.

"If you hear people say we haven't made advances in cancer, we have," Hayes says. "But if you hear people say we've made enough advances, let me tell you about my patients with metastatic breast cancer."

'Catch up and keep up'

Even though the Moonshot funding gives cancer research a crucial boost, sustained funding is needed, Hayes and Lawrence say.

SEE ALSO: How Immune Cells Could Guide Cancer Treatment Decisions

Since 2005, flat funding for the National Cancer Institute has meant a 20 to 25 percent decrease in its actual buying power. That means limited ability to fund new, bold ideas from cancer researchers.

"The wedge between flat funding at the National Institutes of Health and rising inflation is what's stopping progress," Hayes says. "We cannot let that flat funding continue. We need to catch up and keep up."


More Articles About: Industry DX Cancer Research Cancer: Help, Diagnosis & Treatment
Health Lab word mark overlaying blue cells
Health Lab

Explore a variety of healthcare news & stories by visiting the Health Lab home page for more articles.

Media Contact Public Relations

Department of Communication at Michigan Medicine

[email protected]

734-764-2220

Stay Informed

Want top health & research news weekly? Sign up for Health Lab’s newsletters today!

Subscribe
Featured News & Stories microscopic cell nucleus ribosomes purple
Health Lab
Mathematics enable scientists to understand organization within a cell’s nucleus
A clearer picture of how a cell is organized could help biologists learn how to reprogram a cell to halt cancer or other diseases.
Husband and wife in sadness
Health Lab
‘The Immense Burden of Cancer is Not Shouldered Equally’
The disproportionate effect COVID-19 has had on Black Americans may worsen existing racial and ethnic disparities in cancer care, and make health equity harder to achieve.
Graphic of Thyroid
Health Lab
Some Physicians Are Ordering Thyroid Tests for Unsupported Reasons
While most thyroid ultrasound orders are warranted, researchers say guidelines could be clearer to help reduce over diagnosis of thyroid cancer.
In surgery room
Health Lab
Study: Mixed Progress in Efforts to Reduce Low Value Breast Cancer Surgery
A U-M review found national Choosing Wisely recommendations to reduce overtreatment in early stage breast cancer weren’t consistently followed.
Trans PRECISE
Health Lab
New Analytic Tool Designed to Help Guide Precision Cancer Research and Treatment
A new precision medicine analytics tool called TransPRECISE developed to help oncologists with cancer treatment and research.
Thyroid image
Health Lab
For Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer Patients, Less May be More for Post-surgery Surveillance
Low-risk thyroid cancer patients may not see health benefits from increased testing after surgery.